TUdatalib : Figure 3 Comparison iR correction technique

dc.contributor.author	Schmitt, Nicolai
dc.contributor.author	Schmidt, Mareike
dc.contributor.author	Mueller, Jonathan E.
dc.contributor.author	Schmidt, Lasse
dc.contributor.author	Etzold, Bastian J.M.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-09-12T09:22:17Z
dc.date.available	2022-09-12T09:22:17Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.uri	https://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/handle/tudatalib/3565
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.48328/tudatalib-946
dc.description	Figure 3: Comparison of different iR-correction techniques for post-measurement processing of recorded ORR-activity data. A) Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during the polarization curve measurement when adding EIS and CI for post measurement determination of the iR drop. B) iR drop depending on the current density measured via EIS and CI. C) Overall polarization curves with different iR corrections. The red point shows a single point measurement, where EIS was carried out before and after the potential measurement and is used to give the standard deviation due to the temperature related change of iR drop during the measurement time of this single point. Measurements were carried out on GDEs with a Pt loading of 100 µg cm.2.	de_DE
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.classification	403-02 Technische Chemie	de_DE
dc.subject.ddc	660
dc.title	Figure 3 Comparison iR correction technique	de_DE
dc.type	Text	de_DE
tud.unit	TUDa

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0