Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Nicolai
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Mareike
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Jonathan E.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Lasse
dc.contributor.authorEtzold, Bastian J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-12T09:22:17Z
dc.date.available2022-09-12T09:22:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://tudatalib.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/handle/tudatalib/3565
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48328/tudatalib-946
dc.descriptionFigure 3: Comparison of different iR-correction techniques for post-measurement processing of recorded ORR-activity data. A) Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during the polarization curve measurement when adding EIS and CI for post measurement determination of the iR drop. B) iR drop depending on the current density measured via EIS and CI. C) Overall polarization curves with different iR corrections. The red point shows a single point measurement, where EIS was carried out before and after the potential measurement and is used to give the standard deviation due to the temperature related change of iR drop during the measurement time of this single point. Measurements were carried out on GDEs with a Pt loading of 100 µg cm.2.de_DE
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.classification403-02 Technische Chemiede_DE
dc.subject.ddc660
dc.titleFigure 3 Comparison iR correction techniquede_DE
dc.typeTextde_DE
tud.unitTUDa


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Der Datensatz erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0