TUdatalib : 2021

2021

Auflistung nach

Sammlungen in diesem Bereich

Automated High-Throughput Process Simulation for Process Tolerance Analysis [2]

Data of publication "Activity, selectivity and initial degradation of iron molybdate in the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol" [7]

Data of publication "Ionic Liquid Modified Electrocatalysts: a STEM-EDX Approach for Identification of Local Distributions within Ionomer Containing Catalysts Layers" [4]

Data of publication “Oxygen Reduction Reaction Measurements on Platinum Electrocatalysts in Gas Diffusion Electrode Half-cells: Influence of Electrode Preparation, Measurement Protocols and Common Pitfalls” [15]

Direct scale-up of rotating disc electrode (RDE) experiments for CO2 reduction [1]

Neueste Zugänge

VBA-Routine for the Automation of High-Troughput Process Simulation ﻿

Figure 5: Electrochemical properties of GDEs with varying catalyst loadings. ﻿

Figure S5: EIS data at vayring current density ﻿

Figure 2: Determination of the ECSA in RDE and GDE measurements ﻿

Figure 3: Influence of the solvent composition of the catalyst ink ﻿

Figure S11: Influence of the GDL type on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in O2 in 2 M HClO4. ﻿

Figure 7: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on A) CVs in N2-atmosphere at 100 mV s-1 and B) the resulting ECSA (derived from H+- + CO-Stripping) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. ﻿

Figure 8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in synthetic air. ﻿

Figure S4: ORR current density at a potential of 0.85 V vs. RHE of GDEs prepared with catalyst ink containing a varying percentage of ethanol in the water/ethanol solvent mixture ﻿

Figure S10: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the potential of the utilized reversible hydrogen reference electrodes. ﻿

Figure 4: Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during application of ORR protocol 6a and ORR protocol 6b ﻿

Figure S9: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the measured potentials (relating to the ORR activity) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 for low and high current densities in O2 (lA)) and synthetic air (B)). ﻿

Figure 6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured in 2 M HClO4 in O2-atmosphere by application of protocol 6b ﻿

Figure S7: Mass specific ORR activity determined by interpolation out of the recorded polarization curves shown in Figure 6 in O2-atmosphere depending on the catalyst loading. ﻿

Figure S6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured by application of protocol 6a. ﻿

Figure S8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. A) influence on CV curves in O2-atmosphere. B) influence on the limiting current in O2 and synthetic air derived from the plateau of the respective CV curves. ﻿

NH3-TPD of Iron molybdate catalysts ﻿

Direct scale-up of rotating disc electrode (RDE) experiments for CO2 reduction ﻿

Distribution of European plastic waste composition ﻿

XPS Data of iron molybdate catalysts ﻿

VBA-Routine for the Automation of High-Troughput Process Simulation

Figure 5: Electrochemical properties of GDEs with varying catalyst loadings.

Figure S5: EIS data at vayring current density

Figure 2: Determination of the ECSA in RDE and GDE measurements

Figure 3: Influence of the solvent composition of the catalyst ink

Figure S11: Influence of the GDL type on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in O2 in 2 M HClO4.

Figure 7: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on A) CVs in N2-atmosphere at 100 mV s-1 and B) the resulting ECSA (derived from H+- + CO-Stripping) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2.

Figure 8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in synthetic air.

Figure S4: ORR current density at a potential of 0.85 V vs. RHE of GDEs prepared with catalyst ink containing a varying percentage of ethanol in the water/ethanol solvent mixture

Figure S10: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the potential of the utilized reversible hydrogen reference electrodes.

Figure 4: Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during application of ORR protocol 6a and ORR protocol 6b

Figure S9: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the measured potentials (relating to the ORR activity) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 for low and high current densities in O2 (lA)) and synthetic air (B)).

Figure 6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured in 2 M HClO4 in O2-atmosphere by application of protocol 6b

Figure S7: Mass specific ORR activity determined by interpolation out of the recorded polarization curves shown in Figure 6 in O2-atmosphere depending on the catalyst loading.

Figure S6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured by application of protocol 6a.

Figure S8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. A) influence on CV curves in O2-atmosphere. B) influence on the limiting current in O2 and synthetic air derived from the plateau of the respective CV curves.

NH3-TPD of Iron molybdate catalysts

Direct scale-up of rotating disc electrode (RDE) experiments for CO2 reduction

Distribution of European plastic waste composition

XPS Data of iron molybdate catalysts