07 Fachbereich Chemie

07 Fachbereich Chemie

Browse by

Sub-communities within this community

Clemens-Schöpf-Institut für Organische Chemie und Biochemie [0]

Eduard-Zintl-Institut für Anorganische und Physikalische Chemie [5]

Ernst-Berl-Institut für Technische und Makromolekulare Chemie [49]

Fachdidaktik Chemie [0]

Theoretische Chemie [1]

Recent Submissions

Data of the publication: DosCalc: a parallelized tool to compute degree of freedom-separated density of states ﻿

Data of the publication: Where Lennard-Jones Potentials Fail: Iterative Optimization of Ion–Water Pair Potentials Based on Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Data ﻿

Data of the publication: Stability, Speed, and Constraints for Structural Coarse-Graining in VOTCA ﻿

Figure 2: Determination of the ECSA in RDE and GDE measurements ﻿

Figure 3: Influence of the solvent composition of the catalyst ink ﻿

Figure S11: Influence of the GDL type on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in O2 in 2 M HClO4. ﻿

Figure S9: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the measured potentials (relating to the ORR activity) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 for low and high current densities in O2 (lA)) and synthetic air (B)). ﻿

Figure S10: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the potential of the utilized reversible hydrogen reference electrodes. ﻿

Figure 8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in synthetic air. ﻿

Figure S8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. A) influence on CV curves in O2-atmosphere. B) influence on the limiting current in O2 and synthetic air derived from the plateau of the respective CV curves. ﻿

Figure 7: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on A) CVs in N2-atmosphere at 100 mV s-1 and B) the resulting ECSA (derived from H+- + CO-Stripping) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. ﻿

Figure 5: Electrochemical properties of GDEs with varying catalyst loadings. ﻿

Figure 4: Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during application of ORR protocol 6a and ORR protocol 6b ﻿

Figure S5: EIS data at vayring current density ﻿

Figure 6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured in 2 M HClO4 in O2-atmosphere by application of protocol 6b ﻿

Figure S6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured by application of protocol 6a. ﻿

Figure S4: ORR current density at a potential of 0.85 V vs. RHE of GDEs prepared with catalyst ink containing a varying percentage of ethanol in the water/ethanol solvent mixture ﻿

Figure S7: Mass specific ORR activity determined by interpolation out of the recorded polarization curves shown in Figure 6 in O2-atmosphere depending on the catalyst loading. ﻿

NH3-TPD of Iron molybdate catalysts ﻿

Direct scale-up of rotating disc electrode (RDE) experiments for CO2 reduction ﻿

Data of the publication: DosCalc: a parallelized tool to compute degree of freedom-separated density of states

Data of the publication: Where Lennard-Jones Potentials Fail: Iterative Optimization of Ion–Water Pair Potentials Based on Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Data

Data of the publication: Stability, Speed, and Constraints for Structural Coarse-Graining in VOTCA

Figure 2: Determination of the ECSA in RDE and GDE measurements

Figure 3: Influence of the solvent composition of the catalyst ink

Figure S11: Influence of the GDL type on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in O2 in 2 M HClO4.

Figure S9: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the measured potentials (relating to the ORR activity) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 for low and high current densities in O2 (lA)) and synthetic air (B)).

Figure S10: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the potential of the utilized reversible hydrogen reference electrodes.

Figure 8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2 in synthetic air.

Figure S8: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on the ORR activity measured for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2. A) influence on CV curves in O2-atmosphere. B) influence on the limiting current in O2 and synthetic air derived from the plateau of the respective CV curves.

Figure 7: Influence of the electrolyte concentration on A) CVs in N2-atmosphere at 100 mV s-1 and B) the resulting ECSA (derived from H+- + CO-Stripping) for GDEs with a loading of 100 µgPt cm-2.

Figure 5: Electrochemical properties of GDEs with varying catalyst loadings.

Figure 4: Temperature evolution of the cell electrolyte during application of ORR protocol 6a and ORR protocol 6b

Figure S5: EIS data at vayring current density

Figure 6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured in 2 M HClO4 in O2-atmosphere by application of protocol 6b

Figure S6: A) ORR polarization curves and B) mass specific activity (MSA) in oxygen atmosphere for varying catalyst loading on the GDE measured by application of protocol 6a.

Figure S4: ORR current density at a potential of 0.85 V vs. RHE of GDEs prepared with catalyst ink containing a varying percentage of ethanol in the water/ethanol solvent mixture

Figure S7: Mass specific ORR activity determined by interpolation out of the recorded polarization curves shown in Figure 6 in O2-atmosphere depending on the catalyst loading.

NH3-TPD of Iron molybdate catalysts

Direct scale-up of rotating disc electrode (RDE) experiments for CO2 reduction